[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnmjq4y3.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:35:48 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Artem Kashkanov <artem.kashkanov@...el.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] KVM: Move x86's perf guest info callbacks to generic KVM
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:05:29 +0100,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Move x86's perf guest callbacks into common KVM, as they are semantically
> identical to arm64's callbacks (the only other such KVM callbacks).
> arm64 will convert to the common versions in a future patch.
>
> Implement the necessary arm64 arch hooks now to avoid having to provide
> stubs or a temporary #define (from x86) to avoid arm64 compilation errors
> when CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS=y.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 5 +++
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 53 +++++++------------------------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 10 ++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index ed940aec89e0..828b6eaa2c56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -673,6 +673,14 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa);
> void kvm_perf_init(void);
> void kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_pmi_in_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Pardon my x86 ignorance, what is PMI? PMU Interrupt?
> +{
> + /* Any callback while a vCPU is loaded is considered to be in guest. */
> + return !!vcpu;
> +}
> +#endif
Do you really need this #ifdef?
> +
> long kvm_hypercall_pv_features(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> gpa_t kvm_init_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_update_stolen_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index e9a2b8f27792..2b542fdc237e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,11 @@ bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu);
> }
>
> +unsigned long kvm_arch_vcpu_get_ip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */
> static void exit_vm_noop(void *info)
> {
The above nits notwithstanding,
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists