[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWQF4D40a/qpfM3/@kunai>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:37:36 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
Cc: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"R.T.Dickinson" <rtd@...on.com>,
Matthew Leaman <matthew@...on.biz>,
Darren Stevens <darren@...vens-zone.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver
> > Because MAINTAINER dependencies can be a bit nasty, I suggest I drop the
> > MAINTAINER additions for now and we add them later. Then, you can add
> > the pasemi-core as well. D'accord?
> >
>
> We can just split the MAINTAINERS changes into a separate patch and I can
> push that one through the SoC tree, along with other MAINTAINERS updates.
> Does that work for everyone?
That would also work for me. Thank you!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists