linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ae30425-d6d4-5688-36e3-58cc6c6ff264@marcan.st>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:23:52 +0900
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "R.T.Dickinson" <rtd@...on.com>,
        Matthew Leaman <matthew@...on.biz>,
        Darren Stevens <darren@...vens-zone.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Add Apple M1 support to PASemi i2c driver

On 11/10/2021 17.54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> MAINTAINERS. It'll probably apply cleanly to 5.15-rc5 but if that happens again
> 
> It doesn't because Linus' git doesn't have:
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/apple,pcie.yaml
> 
> Because MAINTAINER dependencies can be a bit nasty, I suggest I drop the
> MAINTAINER additions for now and we add them later. Then, you can add
> the pasemi-core as well. D'accord?
> 

We can just split the MAINTAINERS changes into a separate patch and I 
can push that one through the SoC tree, along with other MAINTAINERS 
updates. Does that work for everyone?

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub