[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211012091415.4fa0ce7c@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:14:15 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <p.yadav@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/14] mtd: spinand: Allow enabling Octal DTR mode in
the core
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 02:16:12 +0530
Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com> wrote:
> Enable Octal DTR SPI mode, i.e. 8D-8D-8D mode, if the SPI NAND flash
> device supports it. Mixed OSPI (1S-1S-8S & 1S-8S-8S), mixed DTR modes
> (1S-1D-8D), etc. aren't supported yet.
>
> The method to switch to Octal DTR SPI mode may vary across
> manufacturers. For example, for Winbond, it is enabled by writing
> values to the volatile configuration register. So, let the
> manufacturer's code have their own implementation for switching to
> Octal DTR SPI mode.
>
> Check for the SPI NAND device's support for Octal DTR mode using
> spinand flags, and if the op_templates allows 8D-8D-8D, call
> octal_dtr_enable() manufacturer op. If the SPI controller doesn't
> supports these modes, the selected op_templates will prevent switching
> to the Octal DTR mode. And finally update the spinand reg_proto
> on success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@...com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> index 8e6cf7941a0f..1210946f8447 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,48 @@ static int spinand_init_quad_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> enable ? CFG_QUAD_ENABLE : 0);
> }
>
> +static bool spinand_op_is_octal_dtr(const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> + return op->cmd.buswidth == 8 && op->cmd.dtr &&
> + op->addr.buswidth == 8 && op->addr.dtr &&
> + op->data.buswidth == 8 && op->data.dtr;
> +}
> +
> +static int spinand_init_octal_dtr_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand)
I see no spinand_octal_dtr_disable(), and I feel like we'll want to get
back to single-STR mode just before rebooting/kexec-ing, or if/when
we need to execute other maintenance operations. Actually, I think we
should have something more generic to enter a new mode (see below
for a detailed explanation).
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &spinand->spimem->spi->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!(spinand->flags & SPINAND_HAS_OCTAL_DTR_BIT))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!(spinand_op_is_octal_dtr(spinand->op_templates.read_cache) &&
> + spinand_op_is_octal_dtr(spinand->op_templates.write_cache) &&
> + spinand_op_is_octal_dtr(spinand->op_templates.update_cache)))
> + return 0;
Ok, so you check the controller-side octal-DTR capability when selecting
the read/write/update_cache variants, but what if other commands (reg
access, erase, ...) can't be issued in this mode? I really think all
the commands you might use should be tested at probe time, not just
these 3 operations.
> +
> + if (!spinand->manufacturer->ops->octal_dtr_enable) {
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "Missing ->octal_dtr_enable(), unable to switch mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = spinand->manufacturer->ops->octal_dtr_enable(spinand);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev,
> + "Failed to enable Octal DTR SPI mode (err = %d)\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + spinand->reg_proto = SPINAND_OCTAL_DTR;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev,
> + "%s SPI NAND switched to Octal DTR SPI (8D-8D-8D) mode\n",
> + spinand->manufacturer->name);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int spinand_ecc_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> bool enable)
> {
> @@ -1192,6 +1234,10 @@ static int spinand_init_flash(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = spinand_init_octal_dtr_enable(spinand);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
Why not delaying the 'enter fastest available mode' at the end of this
initialization? I fear some flashes won't support some of the
maintenance commands in 8-8-8-DTR, so it's probably safer to enter it
once you've initialized everything else.
> ret = spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_OTP_ENABLE, 0);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> index 35816b8cfe81..daa2ac5c3110 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ struct spinand_devid {
> * @init: initialize a SPI NAND device
> * @adjust_op: modify the ops for any variation in their cmd, address, dummy or
> * data phase by the manufacturer
> + * @octal_dtr_enable: switch the SPI NAND flash into Octal DTR SPI mode
> * @cleanup: cleanup a SPI NAND device
> *
> * Each SPI NAND manufacturer driver should implement this interface so that
> @@ -280,6 +281,7 @@ struct spinand_manufacturer_ops {
> int (*init)(struct spinand_device *spinand);
> void (*adjust_op)(struct spi_mem_op *op,
> const enum spinand_proto reg_proto);
> + int (*octal_dtr_enable)(struct spinand_device *spinand);
I'd probably opt for a more generic name and pass the spinand_protocol
you want to enter in:
int (*change_mode)(struct spinand_device *spinand,
enum spinand_protocol proto);
This way we can get back to 1-1-1-STR if we have to, and we can also
easily extend the logic to support 4-4-4-STR and 8-8-8-STR, which,
IIRC, are a thing (at least they exist on SPI NORs).
> void (*cleanup)(struct spinand_device *spinand);
> };
>
> @@ -348,6 +350,7 @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
>
> #define SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT BIT(0)
> #define SPINAND_HAS_CR_FEAT_BIT BIT(1)
> +#define SPINAND_HAS_OCTAL_DTR_BIT BIT(2)
>
> /**
> * struct spinand_ondie_ecc_conf - private SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine structure
Powered by blists - more mailing lists