[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211012075614.54576-1-mingchuang.qiao@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:56:14 +0800
From: <mingchuang.qiao@...iatek.com>
To: <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<mingchuang.qiao@...iatek.com>, <haijun.liu@...iatek.com>,
<lambert.wang@...iatek.com>, <kerun.zhu@...iatek.com>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
<utkarsh.h.patel@...el.com>, <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
<rajatja@...gle.com>
Subject: [v5] PCI: Avoid unsync of LTR mechanism configuration
From: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@...iatek.com>
In bus scan flow, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of DEVCTL2 register is
configured in pci_configure_ltr(). If device and bridge both support LTR
mechanism, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of device and bridge will be
enabled in DEVCTL2 register. And pci_dev->ltr_path will be set as 1.
If PCIe link goes down, the "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit of bridge will
change to 0 according to PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16. However, the ->ltr_path
of bridge is still set.
Following shows two scenarios of this LTR issue:
-scenario of device restore
-- bridge LTR enabled
-- device LTR enabled
-- reset device
-- link goes down, bridge disables LTR
-- link comes back up, LTR disabled in both bridge and device
-- restore device state, including LTR enable
-- device sends LTR message
-- bridge reports Unsupported Request
-scenario of device hot-remove/hot-add
-- bridge LTR enabled
-- device LTR enabled
-- hot-remove device
-- link goes down, bridge disables LTR
-- hot-add device and link comes back up
-- scan device, set LTR enable bit of device
-- device sends LTR message
-- bridge reports Unsupported Request
This issue was noticed by AER log as following shows:
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: id=00e8
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal),
type=Transaction Layer, id=00e8(Requester ID)
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: device [8086:9d18] error
status/mask=00100000/00010000
pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: [20] Unsupported Request (First)
It was also noticed when PCIe devices (thunderbolt docks) were hot removed
from chromebooks, and then hot-plugged back again. Once hotplugged back,
the newer Intel chromebooks fail to go into S0ix low power state because
of this LTR issue.(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/
20210204095125.9212-1-mingchuang.qiao@...iatek.com/)
To resolve this issue, check and re-configure "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit
of bridge to make "LTR Mechanism Enable" bit match ltr_path value in
following conditions.
-before configuring device's LTR for hot-remove/hot-add
-before restoring device's DEVCTL2 register when restore device state
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mingchuang Qiao <mingchuang.qiao@...iatek.com>
---
changes of v5
-add more details in commit message
changes of v4
-fix typo of commit message
-rename: pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr()->pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr()
changes of v3
-call pci_reconfigure_bridge_ltr() in probe.c
changes of v2
-modify patch description
-reconfigure bridge's LTR before restoring device DEVCTL2 register
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 +
drivers/pci/probe.c | 13 ++++++++++---
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index b9fecc25d213..6bf65d295331 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1437,6 +1437,24 @@ static int pci_save_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
return 0;
}
+void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
+ struct pci_dev *bridge;
+ u32 ctl;
+
+ bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
+ if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
+ pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl);
+ if (!(ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) {
+ pci_dbg(bridge, "re-enabling LTR\n");
+ pcie_capability_set_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
+ PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
int i = 0;
@@ -1447,6 +1465,13 @@ static void pci_restore_pcie_state(struct pci_dev *dev)
if (!save_state)
return;
+ /*
+ * Downstream ports reset the LTR enable bit when link goes down.
+ * Check and re-configure the bit here before restoring device.
+ * PCIe r5.0, sec 7.5.3.16.
+ */
+ pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev);
+
cap = (u16 *)&save_state->cap.data[0];
pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, cap[i++]);
pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, cap[i++]);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
index 5c59365092fa..b3a5e5287cb7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ void pci_free_cap_save_buffers(struct pci_dev *dev);
bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pci_bridge_d3_update(struct pci_dev *dev);
void pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev);
+void pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev);
static inline void pci_wakeup_event(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 953f15abc850..ade055e9fb58 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2132,9 +2132,16 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev)
* Complex and all intermediate Switches indicate support for LTR.
* PCIe r4.0, sec 6.18.
*/
- if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
- ((bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev)) &&
- bridge->ltr_path)) {
+ if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) {
+ pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
+ PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
+ dev->ltr_path = 1;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
+ if (bridge && bridge->ltr_path) {
+ pci_bridge_reconfigure_ltr(dev);
pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2,
PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN);
dev->ltr_path = 1;
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists