linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:56:57 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree

On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:35 AM Nicolas Ferre
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2021 at 02:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > Error: arch/arm/boot/dts/sama7g5.dtsi:167.3-7 syntax error
> > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >    9be4be3ed1ec ("Merge branch 'arm/dt' into for-next")

Thank you for the report!

I had verified the arm/dt branch by itself, but didn't recheck it after I
merged it into the for-next branch. At least that one is easy to fix
up as I don't send the combined branch to Linus, and the arm/dt
branch does not have the problem.

> I had following patch to have the nodes in alphabetical order:
>
...
>
> Sorry for not having mentioned this conflict in the pull-request.

No worries,

I had assumed you had them sorted by unit-address, so I had them
 in the wrong order as well. Fixing up both issues in for-next
now by redoing the merge.

       Arnd