[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy32wkwH5k3iwdUNDsXjUNX8icQwcz_h2E6UixH7ZmD5KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 22:10:26 +0530
From: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] irqchip/sifive-plic: Add thead,c9xx-plic support
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 9:04 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> thead,c9xx-plic would mask IRQ with readl(claim), so it needn't
> mask/unmask which needed in RISC-V PLIC.
>
> When in IRQS_ONESHOT & IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED path, unnecessary mask
> operation would cause a blocking irq bug in thead,c9xx-plic. Because
> when IRQ is disabled in c9xx, writel(hwirq, claim) would be invalid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> PLIC.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index cf74cfa82045..3756b1c147c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct plic_handler {
> };
> static int plic_parent_irq __ro_after_init;
> static bool plic_cpuhp_setup_done __ro_after_init;
> +static bool disable_mask_unmask __ro_after_init;
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct plic_handler, plic_handlers);
>
> static inline void plic_toggle(struct plic_handler *handler,
> @@ -181,6 +182,13 @@ static int plic_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> {
> struct plic_priv *priv = d->host_data;
>
> + if (disable_mask_unmask) {
> + plic_chip.irq_mask = NULL;
> + plic_chip.irq_unmask = NULL;
> + plic_chip.irq_enable = plic_irq_unmask;
> + plic_chip.irq_disable = plic_irq_mask;
> + }
> +
> irq_domain_set_info(d, irq, hwirq, &plic_chip, d->host_data,
> handle_fasteoi_irq, NULL, NULL);
> irq_set_noprobe(irq);
> @@ -390,5 +398,14 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node *node,
> return error;
> }
>
> +static int __init thead_c9xx_plic_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + disable_mask_unmask = true;
The plic_irqdomain_map() is called for each irq so "plic_chip"
will be updated multiple times.
You can drop the disable_mask_unmask variable and instead
directly update "plic_chip" here.
> +
> + return plic_init(node, parent);
> +}
> +
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(sifive_plic, "sifive,plic-1.0.0", plic_init);
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE(riscv_plic0, "riscv,plic0", plic_init); /* for legacy systems */
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(thead_c9xx_plic, "thead,c9xx-plic", thead_c9xx_plic_init);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists