linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm: fix ARM_SMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:31:40 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm: fix ARM_SMMU_QCOM compilation

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:20 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:58 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > I was hoping you and Joerg could just pick your preferred patch
> > into the iommu fixes tree for v5.15.
> >
> > I currently have nothing else pending for my asm-generic tree that
> > introduced the regression, but I can take it through there if that helps
> > you.
>
> I also don't have any fixes pending, and I don't see any in Joerg's tree so
> it's probably quickest if you send it on yourself. Is that ok?

Sure, no problem. I ended up adding it to the arm/fixes branch of the
soc tree, as I just merged some other fixes there, and it seems as good
as any of the other trees.

      Arnd