lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:35:45 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm: fix ARM_SMMU_QCOM compilation

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:31:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:20 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:33:55AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:58 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > > I was hoping you and Joerg could just pick your preferred patch
> > > into the iommu fixes tree for v5.15.
> > >
> > > I currently have nothing else pending for my asm-generic tree that
> > > introduced the regression, but I can take it through there if that helps
> > > you.
> >
> > I also don't have any fixes pending, and I don't see any in Joerg's tree so
> > it's probably quickest if you send it on yourself. Is that ok?
> 
> Sure, no problem. I ended up adding it to the arm/fixes branch of the
> soc tree, as I just merged some other fixes there, and it seems as good
> as any of the other trees.

Thanks, Arnd!

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ