lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 13:15:06 -0700
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     davidgow@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in executor

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 1:04 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:13 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Per [1], we might not need the array-of-array of kunit_suite's.
> >
> > This RFC patch previews the changes we'd make to the executor to
> > accommodate that by making the executor automatically flatten the
> > kunit_suite*** into a kunit_suite**.
> >
> > The test filtering support [2] added the largest dependency on the
> > current kunit_suite*** layout, so this patch is based on that.
> >
> > It actually drastically simplifies the code, so it might be useful to
> > keep the auto-flattening step until we actually make the change.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/101d12fc9250b7a445ff50a9e7a25cd74d0e16eb.camel@codeconstruct.com.au/
> > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit&id=3b29021ddd10cfb6b2565c623595bd3b02036f33
> >
> > Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
>
> I like it! This seems to make a lot of logic simpler (and from the
> sounds makes Jeremy's proposed module patch easier?).

This would make the subsequent cleanup easier.

Jemery, correct me if I misread, but it sounded like you were thinking
of leaving the current kunit_suite*** layout until afterwards.
Then we'd flatten it as a cleanup.

This patch contains the changes necessary to fix compilation and the
executor unit test for that new layout.

>
> > ---
> >  lib/kunit/executor.c      | 132 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 131 ++++++++++---------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> > index 22640c9ee819..3a7246336625 100644
> > --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
> > +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
> > @@ -88,60 +88,18 @@ kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob)
> >  static char *kunit_shutdown;
> >  core_param(kunit_shutdown, kunit_shutdown, charp, 0644);
> >
> > -static struct kunit_suite * const *
> > -kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
> > -                     struct kunit_test_filter *filter)
> > -{
> > -       int i, n = 0;
> > -       struct kunit_suite **filtered, *filtered_suite;
> > -
> > -       n = 0;
> > -       for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; ++i) {
> > -               if (glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
> > -                       ++n;
> > -       }
> > -
> > -       if (n == 0)
> > -               return NULL;
> > -
> > -       filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -       if (!filtered)
> > -               return NULL;
> > -
> > -       n = 0;
> > -       for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
> > -               if (!glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
> > -                       continue;
> > -               filtered_suite = kunit_filter_tests(subsuite[i], filter->test_glob);
> > -               if (filtered_suite)
> > -                       filtered[n++] = filtered_suite;
> > -       }
> > -       filtered[n] = NULL;
> > -
> > -       return filtered;
> > -}
> > -
> > +/* Stores a NULL-terminated array of suites. */
> >  struct suite_set {
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *start;
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *end;
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const *start;
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const *end;
> >  };
> >
> > -static void kunit_free_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const *subsuite)
> > -{
> > -       unsigned int i;
> > -
> > -       for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; i++)
> > -               kfree(subsuite[i]);
> > -
> > -       kfree(subsuite);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void kunit_free_suite_set(struct suite_set suite_set)
> >  {
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
> >
> >         for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
> > -               kunit_free_subsuite(*suites);
> > +               kfree(*suites);
> >         kfree(suite_set.start);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -149,10 +107,11 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
> >                                             const char *filter_glob)
> >  {
> >         int i;
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite;
> > +       struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite;
> >         struct suite_set filtered;
> >         struct kunit_test_filter filter;
> >
> > +       /* Note: this includes space for the terminating NULL. */
> >         const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start;
> >
> >         copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -164,11 +123,17 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
> >
> >         kunit_parse_filter_glob(&filter, filter_glob);
> >
> > -       for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
> > -               filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(suite_set->start[i], &filter);
> > -               if (filtered_subsuite)
> > -                       *copy++ = filtered_subsuite;
> > +       for (i = 0; suite_set->start[i] != NULL; i++) {
> > +               if (!glob_match(filter.suite_glob, suite_set->start[i]->name))
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               filtered_suite = kunit_filter_tests(suite_set->start[i], filter.test_glob);
> > +               if (!filtered_suite)
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               *copy++ = filtered_suite;
> >         }
> > +       *copy = NULL;
> >         filtered.end = copy;
> >
> >         kfree(filter.suite_glob);
> > @@ -190,52 +155,56 @@ static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void)
> >
> >  }
> >
> > -static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> > -{
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
> > -       int num_of_suites = 0;
> > -
> > -       for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> > -               for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
> > -                       num_of_suites++;
> > -
> > -       pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> > -       pr_info("1..%d\n", num_of_suites);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> >  {
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> > -
> > -       kunit_print_tap_header(suite_set);
> > +       pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> > +       pr_info("1..%zu\n", suite_set->end - suite_set->start);
> >
> > -       for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> > -               __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
> > +       __kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set)
> >  {
> > -       unsigned int i;
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const *suites;
> >         struct kunit_case *test_case;
> >
> >         /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */
> >         pr_info("TAP version 14\n");
> >
> >         for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> > -               for (i = 0; (*suites)[i] != NULL; i++) {
> > -                       kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites)[i], test_case) {
> > -                               pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)[i]->name, test_case->name);
> > -                       }
> > +               kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) {
> > +                       pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name);
> >                 }
> >  }
> >
> > +// TODO(dlatypov@...gle.com): delete this when we store suites in a single array.
> > +static struct suite_set make_suite_set(void)
> > +{
> > +       struct suite_set flattened;
> > +       size_t num_of_suites = 0;
> > +
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
> > +       struct kunit_suite **end;
> > +
> > +       for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; suites < __kunit_suites_end; suites++)
> > +               for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
> > +                       num_of_suites++;
> > +
> > +       end = kcalloc(num_of_suites + 1, sizeof(*flattened.start), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       flattened.start = end;
> > +
> > +       for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; suites < __kunit_suites_end; suites++)
> > +               for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
> > +                       *end++ = *subsuite;
> > +       *end = NULL;
> > +       flattened.end = end;
> > +       return flattened;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> >  {
> > -       struct suite_set suite_set = {
> > -               .start = __kunit_suites_start,
> > -               .end = __kunit_suites_end,
> > -       };
> > +       struct suite_set suite_set = make_suite_set();
> > +       struct kunit_suite * const *unfiltered = suite_set.start; /* need to free at end */
> >
> >         if (filter_glob_param)
> >                 suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param);
> > @@ -247,9 +216,10 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
> >         else
> >                 pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param);
> >
> > -       if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each array */
> > +       if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */
> >                 kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
> >         }
> > +       kfree(unfiltered);
> >
> >         kunit_handle_shutdown();
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
> > index 7d2b8dc668b1..d9fce637eb56 100644
> > --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
> > +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c
> > @@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
> >  #include <kunit/test.h>
> >
> >  static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free);
> > -static void free_subsuite_at_end(struct kunit *test,
> > -                                struct kunit_suite *const *to_free);
> >  static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test,
> >                                             const char *suite_name,
> >                                             struct kunit_case *test_cases);
> > @@ -41,124 +39,77 @@ static void parse_filter_test(struct kunit *test)
> >         kfree(filter.test_glob);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void filter_subsuite_test(struct kunit *test)
> > +static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test)
> >  {
> >         struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL};
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const *filtered;
> > -       struct kunit_test_filter filter = {
> > -               .suite_glob = "suite2",
> > -               .test_glob = NULL,
> > -       };
> > +       struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]};
> > +       struct suite_set got;
> >
> >         subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases);
> >         subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases);
> >
> >         /* Want: suite1, suite2, NULL -> suite2, NULL */
> > -       filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter);
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered);
> > -       free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered);
> > +       got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2");
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start);
> > +       kfree_at_end(test, got.start);
> >
> >         /* Validate we just have suite2 */
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]);
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->name, "suite2");
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[1]);
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->name, "suite2");
> > +       // DO NOT SUBMIT: null-terminated for now.
>
> Can you elaborate what you mean here?

This change makes the array null-terminated for
__kunit_test_suites_init to work.

E.g. we allocate one more element in the suite_set's array and have to
remember to allocate one extra element and write NULL to it
$ git show HEAD | grep -P '^\+\s+\*.*= NULL;'
+       *copy = NULL;
+       *end = NULL;

But since we'd always be tracking how long our array is, we don't
actually need that.
We could theoretically pass a start/end (or a suite_set) into
__kunit_test_suites_init() instead.

It's currently
          unsigned int i;

          for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) {
                  kunit_init_suite(suites[i]);
                  kunit_run_tests(suites[i]);
          }

It could just become
          // pass in `end` somehow
          for (; suites < end; ++suites) {
                  kunit_init_suite(*suites);
                  kunit_run_tests(*suites);
          }
Dropping the null-termination would just make the logic for making a
filtered copy a bit less subtle.

>
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, got.end - got.start, 1);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, *got.end);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void filter_subsuite_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test)
> > +static void filter_suites_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test)
> >  {
> >         struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL};
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const *filtered;
> > -       struct kunit_test_filter filter = {
> > -               .suite_glob = "suite2",
> > -               .test_glob = "test2",
> > -       };
> > +       struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]};
> > +       struct suite_set got;
> >
> >         subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases);
> >         subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases);
> >
> >         /* Want: suite1, suite2, NULL -> suite2 (just test1), NULL */
> > -       filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter);
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered);
> > -       free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered);
> > +       got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2.test2");
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start);
> > +       kfree_at_end(test, got.start);
> >
> >         /* Validate we just have suite2 */
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]);
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->name, "suite2");
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[1]);
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->name, "suite2");
> > +       // DO NOT SUBMIT: null-terminated for now.
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, got.end - got.start, 1);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, *got.end);
> >
> >         /* Now validate we just have test2 */
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]->test_cases);
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->test_cases[0].name, "test2");
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[0]->test_cases[1].name);
> > +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->test_cases[0].name, "test2");
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[1].name);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void filter_subsuite_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test)
> > +static void filter_suites_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test)
> >  {
> >         struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL};
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const *filtered;
> > -       struct kunit_test_filter filter = {
> > -               .suite_glob = "not_found",
> > -               .test_glob = NULL,
> > -       };
> > +       struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]};
> > +       struct suite_set got;
> >
> >         subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases);
> >         subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases);
> >
> > -       filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter);
> > -       free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered); /* just in case */
> > -
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, filtered,
> > -                              "should be NULL to indicate no match");
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void kfree_subsuites_at_end(struct kunit *test, struct suite_set *suite_set)
> > -{
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
> > +       got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "not_found");
> > +       kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */
> >
> > -       kfree_at_end(test, suite_set->start);
> > -       for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
> > -               free_subsuite_at_end(test, *suites);
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end,
> > +                               "should be empty to indicate no match");
> >  }
> >
> > -static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test)
> > -{
> > -       /* Suites per-file are stored as a NULL terminated array */
> > -       struct kunit_suite *subsuites[2][2] = {
> > -               {NULL, NULL},
> > -               {NULL, NULL},
> > -       };
> > -       /* Match the memory layout of suite_set */
> > -       struct kunit_suite * const * const suites[2] = {
> > -               subsuites[0], subsuites[1],
> > -       };
> > -
> > -       const struct suite_set suite_set = {
> > -               .start = suites,
> > -               .end = suites + 2,
> > -       };
> > -       struct suite_set filtered = {.start = NULL, .end = NULL};
> > -
> > -       /* Emulate two files, each having one suite */
> > -       subsuites[0][0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite0", dummy_test_cases);
> > -       subsuites[1][0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases);
> > -
> > -       /* Filter out suite1 */
> > -       filtered = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite0");
> > -       kfree_subsuites_at_end(test, &filtered); /* let us use ASSERTs without leaking */
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, filtered.end - filtered.start, (ptrdiff_t)1);
> > -
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start);
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start[0]);
> > -       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start[0][0]);
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0");
> > -}
> >
> >  static struct kunit_case executor_test_cases[] = {
> >         KUNIT_CASE(parse_filter_test),
> > -       KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_test),
> > -       KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_test_glob_test),
> > -       KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_to_empty_test),
> >         KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test),
> > +       KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test_glob_test),
> > +       KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_to_empty_test),
> >         {}
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -188,20 +139,6 @@ static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free)
> >                                      (void *)to_free);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void free_subsuite_res_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
> > -{
> > -       kunit_free_subsuite(res->data);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void free_subsuite_at_end(struct kunit *test,
> > -                                struct kunit_suite *const *to_free)
> > -{
> > -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(to_free))
> > -               return;
> > -       kunit_alloc_resource(test, NULL, free_subsuite_res_free,
> > -                            GFP_KERNEL, (void *)to_free);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test,
> >                                             const char *suite_name,
> >                                             struct kunit_case *test_cases)
> >
> > base-commit: e7198adb84dcad671ad4f0e90aaa7e9fabf258dc
> > --
> > 2.33.0.882.g93a45727a2-goog
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ