[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27874771.ckeLuOHhQ7@diego>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 01:06:43 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
Hi Linus,
Am Donnerstag, 14. Oktober 2021, 00:31:59 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:46 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:40:17 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > > Convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changed V3:
> (...)
> > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> > following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> > incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
>
> Rob can you tell me how you like me to handle this?
> Do we merge the nice new bindings and deal with the
> aftermath or do we need to fix the DTS files in the same
> patch series?
I guess personally I'd say it comes together in linux-next.
But if you like your pinctrl-tree without additional warnings dtbs_check
till the next -rc1, I'll add Acks to patches 1+2.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists