[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYArdPwEVf_5pwsROKPjbnVAtU3mf9v1z6WXGPoBb=SZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 00:31:59 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt
to YAML
On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:46 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 16:40:17 +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > Convert rockchip,pinctrl.txt to YAML
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changed V3:
(...)
> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
> incorrect. These may not be new warnings.
Rob can you tell me how you like me to handle this?
Do we merge the nice new bindings and deal with the
aftermath or do we need to fix the DTS files in the same
patch series?
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists