linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211013075125.GA6701@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:51:26 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        James Clark <James.Clark@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf arm-spe: Implement find_snapshot callback

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:39:16AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:55:37PM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
> > On 06/10/2021 10:51, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:35:20AM +0100, German Gomez wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >>> So simply say, I think the head pointer monotonically increasing is
> > >>> the right thing to do in Arm SPE driver.
> > >> I will talk to James about how we can proceed on this.
> > > Thanks!
> > 
> > I took this offline with James and, though it looks possible to patch
> > the SPE driver to have a monotonically increasing head pointer in order
> > to simplify the handling in the perf tool, it could be a breaking change
> > for users of the perf_event_open syscall that currently rely on the way
> > it works now.
> 
> Here I cannot create the connection between AUX head pointer and the
> breakage of calling perf_event_open().
> 
> Could you elaborate what's the reason the monotonical increasing head
> pointer will lead to the breakage for perf_event_open()?

It's a user-visible change in behaviour, isn't it? Therefore we risk
breaking applications that rely on the current behaviour if we change it
unconditionally.

Given that the driver has always worked like this and it doesn't sound like
it's the end of the world to deal with it in userspace (after all, it's
aligned with intel-pt), then I don't think we should change it.

Will