[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cunfst5ff37.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:29:00 +0100
From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Clarify the kvm_run.emulation_failure
structure layout
On Tuesday, 2021-10-12 at 23:45:43 GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, David Edmondson wrote:
>> Until more flags for kvm_run.emulation_failure flags are defined, it
>> is undetermined whether new payload elements corresponding to those
>> flags will be additive or alternative. As a hint to userspace that an
>> alternative is possible, wrap the current payload elements in a union.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>
>> ---
>
> To complete the set... :-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists