[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44630562-a855-f3e2-a427-9f3da3abdd70@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 17:24:52 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Clarify the kvm_run.emulation_failure
structure layout
On 13/10/21 11:29, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2021-10-12 at 23:45:43 GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, David Edmondson wrote:
>>> Until more flags for kvm_run.emulation_failure flags are defined, it
>>> is undetermined whether new payload elements corresponding to those
>>> flags will be additive or alternative. As a hint to userspace that an
>>> alternative is possible, wrap the current payload elements in a union.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> To complete the set... :-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
Queued, thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists