[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWbUFnway11HwuZl@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:41:58 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, bvanassche@....org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
joe@...ches.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/12] sysfs: fix deadlock race with module removal
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 03:26:02PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:50:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > For example, why does this not work?
>
> It does for the write case for sure,
I mispoke, just for the record, the changes you mentioned actually don't
suffice for the test cases in question for test_sysfs, the deadlock
still occurs with those changes. At first I thought it did but I had failed
to remove my own fix first on fs/kernfs/dir.c. After removing that and
just trying the proposed changes I confirm it does not fix the deadlock.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists