[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40549939-e4c2-7b20-6bb6-0b5a46731b1c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:15:02 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benoit Grégoire <benoitg@...us.ca>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows
on newer systems
Hi,
On 10/14/21 3:40 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 01:03:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> + * Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to system
>> + * RAM in the PCI bridge memory window returned by the ACPI _CRS method,
>
> Please avoid the overly long lines in your comments.
?
These lines are easily within the new 100 char line-length-limit ?
And checkpatch also does not complain about this.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists