[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWhJ2kmGzNMVY+cP@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:16:42 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benoit Grégoire <benoitg@...us.ca>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows
on newer systems
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 05:15:02PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/14/21 3:40 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 01:03:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> + * Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to system
> >> + * RAM in the PCI bridge memory window returned by the ACPI _CRS method,
> >
> > Please avoid the overly long lines in your comments.
>
> ?
>
> These lines are easily within the new 100 char line-length-limit ?
That is an exceptional limit if exceeding 80 improves readability for
individual lines.
> And checkpatch also does not complain about this.
checkpatch has been completely broken for a while and should not be
relied on in any way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists