lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211014154032.10103-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:40:32 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
        Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/PCI/ACPI: Replace printk calls with pr_info/pr_warn calls

The direct use of printk is deprecated, replace the printk calls
in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c with pr_info/pr_warn calls.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
---
Note this applies on top of my:
"x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows on newer systems"
patch and was requested by several people during review of that patch.
---
 arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index 4537e3561c91..98fbdf4fa698 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "PCI: " fmt
+
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -38,7 +41,7 @@ static int __init set_nouse_crs(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
 
 static int __init set_ignore_seg(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
 {
-	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s detected: ignoring ACPI _SEG\n", id->ident);
+	pr_info("%s detected: ignoring ACPI _SEG\n", id->ident);
 	pci_ignore_seg = true;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -158,10 +161,9 @@ void __init pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void)
 	else if (pci_probe & PCI_USE__CRS)
 		pci_use_crs = true;
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s host bridge windows from ACPI; "
-	       "if necessary, use \"pci=%s\" and report a bug\n",
-	       pci_use_crs ? "Using" : "Ignoring",
-	       pci_use_crs ? "nocrs" : "use_crs");
+	pr_info("%s host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary, use \"pci=%s\" and report a bug\n",
+		pci_use_crs ? "Using" : "Ignoring",
+		pci_use_crs ? "nocrs" : "use_crs");
 
 	/*
 	 * Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to
@@ -189,8 +191,8 @@ void __init pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void)
 	else if (pci_probe & PCI_USE_E820)
 		pci_use_e820 = true;
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s E820 reservations for host bridge windows\n",
-	       pci_use_e820 ? "Honoring" : "Ignoring");
+	pr_info("%s E820 reservations for host bridge windows\n",
+		pci_use_e820 ? "Honoring" : "Ignoring");
 }
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
@@ -365,9 +367,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
 		root->segment = domain = 0;
 
 	if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "pci_bus %04x:%02x: "
-		       "ignored (multiple domains not supported)\n",
-		       domain, busnum);
+		pr_warn("pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (multiple domains not supported)\n",
+			domain, busnum);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -435,7 +436,7 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
 	if (acpi_noirq)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
+	pr_info("Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
 	acpi_irq_penalty_init();
 	pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
 	pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
@@ -447,7 +448,7 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
 		 * also do it here in case there are still broken drivers that
 		 * don't use pci_enable_device().
 		 */
-		printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Routing PCI interrupts for all devices because \"pci=routeirq\" specified\n");
+		pr_info("Routing PCI interrupts for all devices because \"pci=routeirq\" specified\n");
 		for_each_pci_dev(dev)
 			acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
 	}
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ