linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI/ACPI: Replace printk calls with pr_info/pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0j1xgq1SS5wE6sRgB394ppJ97-vreDU1RZsucpEQxbp9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:52:25 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
        Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI/ACPI: Replace printk calls with pr_info/pr_warn calls

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:40 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The direct use of printk is deprecated, replace the printk calls
> in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c with pr_info/pr_warn calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

> ---
> Note this applies on top of my:
> "x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows on newer systems"
> patch and was requested by several people during review of that patch.

I would send it as a [2/2] in the same series then, but ...

> ---
>  arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 4537e3561c91..98fbdf4fa698 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "PCI: " fmt
> +
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -38,7 +41,7 @@ static int __init set_nouse_crs(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>
>  static int __init set_ignore_seg(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>  {
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s detected: ignoring ACPI _SEG\n", id->ident);
> +       pr_info("%s detected: ignoring ACPI _SEG\n", id->ident);
>         pci_ignore_seg = true;
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -158,10 +161,9 @@ void __init pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void)
>         else if (pci_probe & PCI_USE__CRS)
>                 pci_use_crs = true;
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s host bridge windows from ACPI; "
> -              "if necessary, use \"pci=%s\" and report a bug\n",
> -              pci_use_crs ? "Using" : "Ignoring",
> -              pci_use_crs ? "nocrs" : "use_crs");
> +       pr_info("%s host bridge windows from ACPI; if necessary, use \"pci=%s\" and report a bug\n",
> +               pci_use_crs ? "Using" : "Ignoring",
> +               pci_use_crs ? "nocrs" : "use_crs");
>
>         /*
>          * Some BIOS-es contain a bug where they add addresses which map to
> @@ -189,8 +191,8 @@ void __init pci_acpi_crs_quirks(void)
>         else if (pci_probe & PCI_USE_E820)
>                 pci_use_e820 = true;
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: %s E820 reservations for host bridge windows\n",
> -              pci_use_e820 ? "Honoring" : "Ignoring");
> +       pr_info("%s E820 reservations for host bridge windows\n",
> +               pci_use_e820 ? "Honoring" : "Ignoring");
>  }
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG
> @@ -365,9 +367,8 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>                 root->segment = domain = 0;
>
>         if (domain && !pci_domains_supported) {
> -               printk(KERN_WARNING "pci_bus %04x:%02x: "
> -                      "ignored (multiple domains not supported)\n",
> -                      domain, busnum);
> +               pr_warn("pci_bus %04x:%02x: ignored (multiple domains not supported)\n",
> +                       domain, busnum);
>                 return NULL;
>         }
>
> @@ -435,7 +436,7 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>         if (acpi_noirq)
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
> -       printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
> +       pr_info("Using ACPI for IRQ routing\n");
>         acpi_irq_penalty_init();
>         pcibios_enable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_enable;
>         pcibios_disable_irq = acpi_pci_irq_disable;
> @@ -447,7 +448,7 @@ int __init pci_acpi_init(void)
>                  * also do it here in case there are still broken drivers that
>                  * don't use pci_enable_device().
>                  */
> -               printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Routing PCI interrupts for all devices because \"pci=routeirq\" specified\n");
> +               pr_info("Routing PCI interrupts for all devices because \"pci=routeirq\" specified\n");
>                 for_each_pci_dev(dev)
>                         acpi_pci_irq_enable(dev);
>         }
> --
> 2.31.1
>