lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <163425256290.1688384.5646232860050218479@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Oct 2021 16:02:42 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, open list:
        OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: sprd: Add bindings for ums512 global registers

Quoting Rob Herring (2021-10-14 09:18:16)
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't explicitly build DT documentation.
> >
> > Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C,
> > ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd
> > configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you
> > might have to convince them that this is important too.
> 
> It's really just a matter of turning on the build in
> allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because
> there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably
> make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config
> independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless.
> 
> I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before
> stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight
> improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the
> breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window.
> 

I run `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="<path to yaml file>"` but
nowadays this seems to check all the bindings and not just the one
binding I care to check. Did something break?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ