linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: do not decrement idle task preempt count in CPU offline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h7dijo4m.mognet@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:36:57 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     mpe@...erman.id.au, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clg@...d.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/smp: do not decrement idle task preempt count in CPU offline

On 15/10/21 09:55, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> With PREEMPT_COUNT=y, when a CPU is offlined and then onlined again, we
> get:
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0/0x00000000
> no locks held by swapper/1/0.
> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2+ #100
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0x108
>  __schedule_bug+0xac/0xe0
>  __schedule+0xcf8/0x10d0
>  schedule_idle+0x3c/0x70
>  do_idle+0x2d8/0x4a0
>  cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40
>  start_secondary+0x2ec/0x3a0
>  start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
>
> This is because powerpc's arch_cpu_idle_dead() decrements the idle task's
> preempt count, for reasons explained in commit a7c2bb8279d2 ("powerpc:
> Re-enable preemption before cpu_die()"), specifically "start_secondary()
> expects a preempt_count() of 0."
>
> However, since commit 2c669ef6979c ("powerpc/preempt: Don't touch the idle
> task's preempt_count during hotplug") and commit f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core:
> Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled"), that justification no
> longer holds.
>
> The idle task isn't supposed to re-enable preemption, so remove the
> vestigial preempt_enable() from the CPU offline path.
>

Humph, I got confused because 2c669ef6979c explicitly mentions hotplug,
but that's the hotplug machinery which is already involved for bringing up
the secondaries at boot time.

IIUC your issue here is the preempt_count being messed up when
hot-unplugging a CPU, which leads to fireworks during hotplug (IOW I didn't
test my last patch against hotplug - my bad!)

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>

> Tested with pseries and powernv in qemu, and pseries on PowerVM.
>
> Fixes: 2c669ef6979c ("powerpc/preempt: Don't touch the idle task's preempt_count during hotplug")
> Fixes: f1a0a376ca0c ("sched/core: Initialize the idle task with preemption disabled")

I think only the first Fixes: is needed.

> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 9cc7d3dbf439..605bab448f84 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1730,8 +1730,6 @@ void __cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
>
>  void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
>  {
> -	sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
> -
>       /*
>        * Disable on the down path. This will be re-enabled by
>        * start_secondary() via start_secondary_resume() below
> --
> 2.31.1