[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d492cef3640414d85ecfdb602ad6fa0@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:37:06 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: "zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com" <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com" <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Relax platform response timeout to 1
second.
> We observe that the waiting time for DDR error injection is about 10 ms
> and that for PCIe error injection is about 500 ms in Arm platfrom.
>
> In this patch, we relax the response timeout to 1 second and allow user to
> pass the time out value as a argument.
Spinning for 1ms was maybe ok. Spinning for up to 1s seems like a bad idea.
This code is executed inside a mutex ... so maybe it is safe to sleep instead of spin?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists