linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/5200: dts: fix localbus node warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLW=6AuKKT5cA0RYhgg268O9yiZRLuKh7HK3i_N24wWGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:31:46 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/5200: dts: fix localbus node warnings

On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 5:05 PM Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de> wrote:
>
> Fix build warnings like:
> localbus:ranges: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed
> ...
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /localbus: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (simple_bus_reg): /localbus/flash@0,0: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "0"
>
> Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a3m071.dts    | 12 +++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a4m072.dts    | 20 ++++++++---------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/charon.dts    | 14 ++++++------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/cm5200.dts    |  7 ++++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/digsy_mtc.dts | 16 ++++++++------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200.dts  |  4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts |  6 +++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/media5200.dts | 20 +++++++++--------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/motionpro.dts | 32 +++++++++++++++------------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc5200b.dtsi |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mucmc52.dts   | 34 +++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2d.dts       | 10 +++++----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2d.dtsi      | 12 +++++-----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2d300.dts    | 10 +++++----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2dnt2.dts    | 10 +++++----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2i.dts       |  4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2mnt.dts     |  4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o3dnt.dts     | 10 +++++----
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm030.dts    |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/pcm032.dts    | 26 ++++++++++++----------
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/tqm5200.dts   |  4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/uc101.dts     | 14 +++++++-----
>  22 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a3m071.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a3m071.dts
> index 034cfd8aa95b..14e59aaa0ba7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a3m071.dts
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/a3m071.dts
> @@ -87,15 +87,15 @@
>                 };
>         };
>
> -       localbus {
> +       localbus@...00000 {

That's not right, as 0x80000000 doesn't exist in 'reg' or 'ranges'.
Without 'reg', the correct unit-address is 'fc000000'.  Perhaps there
should be a 'reg' entry though.

>                 compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-lpb","simple-bus";
>                 #address-cells = <2>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
> -               ranges = <0 0 0xfc000000 0x02000000
> -                         3 0 0xe9000000 0x00080000
> -                         5 0 0xe8000000 0x00010000>;
> +               ranges = <0 0 0xfc000000 0x02000000>,
> +                        <3 0 0xe9000000 0x00080000>,
> +                        <5 0 0xe8000000 0x00010000>;
>
> -               flash@0,0 {
> +               flash@0 {

This change is debatable. Normally, if we have chipselects, then
that's a separate field and a comma is appropriate. However, h/w with
chip selects require setup and aren't a simple-bus. I guess the
bootloader does the setup, so kind of a gray area.

The warning for this is off by default, so I'd leave it alone.

Rob