linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 39/45] KVM: SVM: Introduce ops for the post gfn map and unmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4e41dcff-7c7b-cf36-434a-c7732e7e8ff2@amd.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:31:51 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 39/45] KVM: SVM: Introduce ops for the post gfn
 map and unmap


On 10/13/21 1:16 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>> When SEV-SNP is enabled in the guest VM, the guest memory pages can
>>> either be a private or shared. A write from the hypervisor goes through
>>> the RMP checks. If hardware sees that hypervisor is attempting to write
>>> to a guest private page, then it triggers an RMP violation #PF.
>>>
>>> To avoid the RMP violation, add post_{map,unmap}_gfn() ops that can be
>>> used to verify that its safe to map a given guest page. Use the SRCU to
>>> protect against the page state change for existing mapped pages.
>> SRCU isn't protecting anything.  The synchronize_srcu_expedited() in the PSC code
>> forces it to wait for existing maps to go away, but it doesn't prevent new maps
>> from being created while the actual RMP updates are in-flight.  Most telling is
>> that the RMP updates happen _after_ the synchronize_srcu_expedited() call.
> Argh, another goof on my part.  Rereading prior feedback, I see that I loosely
> suggested SRCU as a possible solution.  That was a bad, bad suggestion.  I think
> (hope) I made it offhand without really thinking it through.  SRCU can't work in
> this case, because the whole premise of Read-Copy-Update is that there can be
> multiple copies of the data.  That simply can't be true for the RMP as hardware
> operates on a single table.
>
> In the future, please don't hesitate to push back on and/or question suggestions,
> especially those that are made without concrete examples, i.e. are likely off the
> cuff.  My goal isn't to set you up for failure :-/

What do you think about going back to my initial proposal of per-gfn
tracking [1] ? We can limit the changes to just for the kvm_vcpu_map()
and let the copy_to_user() take a fault and return an error (if it
attempt to write to guest private). If PSC happen while lock is held
then simplify return and let the guest retry PSC.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210707183616.5620-36-brijesh.singh@amd.com/