[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb6e3800-7eaf-868d-365a-9b76665bd06c@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:11:19 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 34/45] KVM: SVM: Do not use long-lived GHCB map
while setting scratch area
On 10/13/21 2:20 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> The setup_vmgexit_scratch() function may rely on a long-lived GHCB
>> mapping if the GHCB shared buffer area was used for the scratch area.
>> In preparation for eliminating the long-lived GHCB mapping, always
>> allocate a buffer for the scratch area so it can be accessed without
>> the GHCB mapping.
> Would it make sense to post this patch and the next (Remove the long-lived GHCB
> host map) in a separate mini-series? It's needed for SNP, but AFAICT there's
> nothing that depends on SNP. Getting this merged ahead of time would reduce the
> size of the SNP series by a smidge.
While testing with random configs, I am seeing some might_sleep() warns.
This is happening mainly because during the vmrun the GHCB is accessed
with preempt disabled. The kvm_vcpu_map() -> kmap() reports the warning.
I am leaning towards creating a cache on the vmgexit and use that cache
instead of the doing a kmap() on every access. Does that sound okay to you ?
-Brijesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists