[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB51910D813AD10B93CFADFB67F1B99@PH0PR11MB5191.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:37:58 +0000
From: "Li, Meng" <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"Roy.Pledge@....com" <Roy.Pledge@....com>,
"leoyang.li@....com" <leoyang.li@....com>,
"ruxandra.radulescu@....com" <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
"horia.geanta@....com" <horia.geanta@....com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: protect smp_processor_id when get
processor id
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 9:40 PM
> To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@...driver.com>; Roy.Pledge@....com;
> leoyang.li@....com; ruxandra.radulescu@....com; horia.geanta@....com
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: dpio: protect smp_processor_id when get
> processor id
>
> [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
>
> On 2021-10-15 07:36, Meng.Li@...driver.com wrote:
> > From: Meng Li <meng.li@...driver.com>
> >
> > When enable debug kernel configs,there will be calltrace as below:
> >
> > BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> > swapper/0/1 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
> > CPU: 6 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.63-yocto-standard #1
> > Hardware name: NXP Layerscape LX2160ARDB (DT) Call trace:
> > dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
> > show_stack+0x24/0x30
> > dump_stack+0xf0/0x13c
> > check_preemption_disabled+0x100/0x110
> > debug_smp_processor_id+0x20/0x30
> > dpaa2_io_query_fq_count+0xdc/0x154
> > dpaa2_eth_stop+0x144/0x314
> > __dev_close_many+0xdc/0x160
> > __dev_change_flags+0xe8/0x220
> > dev_change_flags+0x30/0x70
> > ic_close_devs+0x50/0x78
> > ip_auto_config+0xed0/0xf10
> > do_one_initcall+0xac/0x460
> > kernel_init_freeable+0x30c/0x378
> > kernel_init+0x20/0x128
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x38
> >
> > Because smp_processor_id() should be invoked in preempt disable status.
> > So, add preempt_disable/enable() to protect smp_processor_id().
>
> If preemption doesn't matter anyway, as the comment in the context implies,
> then it probably makes more sense just to use
> raw_smp_processor_id() instead.
>
Thanks for your professional suggest, I will raw_smp_processor_id() and test.
If works fine, I will send v2 patch.
Thanks,
Limeng
> Robin.
>
> > Fixes: c89105c9b390 ("staging: fsl-mc: Move DPIO from staging to
> > drivers/soc/fsl")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Meng Li <Meng.Li@...driver.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > index 19f47ea9dab0..afc3b89b0fc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/dpio-service.c
> > @@ -58,8 +58,11 @@ static inline struct dpaa2_io
> *service_select_by_cpu(struct dpaa2_io *d,
> > * If cpu == -1, choose the current cpu, with no guarantees about
> > * potentially being migrated away.
> > */
> > - if (cpu < 0)
> > - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + if (cpu < 0) {
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + preempt_enable();
> > + }
> >
> > /* If a specific cpu was requested, pick it up immediately */
> > return dpio_by_cpu[cpu];
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists