lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 17:44:33 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC:     <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] cxl/pci: Split cxl_pci_setup_regs()

On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:44:34 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:

> From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> 
> In preparation for moving parts of register mapping to cxl_core, split

Ah. Guess this planned move is why the naming change in the earlier patch.
Fair enough, but perhaps call it out there as well as here.

No comments to add to this one.

> cxl_pci_setup_regs() into a helper that finds register blocks,
> (cxl_find_regblock()), and a generic wrapper that probes the precise
> register sets within a block (cxl_setup_regs()).
> 
> Move the actual mapping (cxl_map_regs()) of the only register-set that
> cxl_pci cares about (memory device registers) up a level from the former
> cxl_pci_setup_regs() into cxl_pci_probe().
> 
> With this change the unused component registers are no longer mapped,
> but the helpers are primed to move into the core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>
> [djbw: rebase on the cxl_register_map refactor]
> [djbw: drop cxl_map_regs() for component registers]
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/pci.c |   73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index b42407d067ac..b6bc8e5ca028 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -433,72 +433,69 @@ static void cxl_decode_regblock(u32 reg_lo, u32 reg_hi,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * cxl_pci_setup_regs() - Setup necessary MMIO.
> - * @cxlm: The CXL memory device to communicate with.
> + * cxl_find_regblock() - Locate register blocks by type
> + * @pdev: The CXL PCI device to enumerate.
> + * @type: Register Block Indicator id
> + * @map: Enumeration output, clobbered on error
>   *
> - * Return: 0 if all necessary registers mapped.
> + * Return: 0 if register block enumerated, negative error code otherwise
>   *
> - * A memory device is required by spec to implement a certain set of MMIO
> - * regions. The purpose of this function is to enumerate and map those
> - * registers.
> + * A CXL DVSEC may additional point one or more register blocks, search

may point to one or more...
(perhaps - I'm not quite sure of the intended meaning)

> + * for them by @type.
>   */
> -static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
> +static int cxl_find_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> +			     struct cxl_register_map *map)
>  {
>  	u32 regloc_size, regblocks;
> -	int regloc, i, n_maps, ret = 0;
> -	struct device *dev = cxlm->dev;
> -	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> -	struct cxl_register_map *map, maps[CXL_REGLOC_RBI_TYPES];
> +	int regloc, i;
>  
>  	regloc = cxl_pci_dvsec(pdev, PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_DVSEC_ID);
> -	if (!regloc) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "register location dvsec not found\n");
> +	if (!regloc)
>  		return -ENXIO;
> -	}
>  
> -	/* Get the size of the Register Locator DVSEC */
>  	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1, &regloc_size);
>  	regloc_size = FIELD_GET(PCI_DVSEC_HEADER1_LENGTH_MASK, regloc_size);
>  
>  	regloc += PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET;
>  	regblocks = (regloc_size - PCI_DVSEC_ID_CXL_REGLOC_BLOCK1_OFFSET) / 8;
>  
> -	for (i = 0, n_maps = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < regblocks; i++, regloc += 8) {
>  		u32 reg_lo, reg_hi;
>  
>  		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc, &reg_lo);
>  		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, regloc + 4, &reg_hi);
>  
> -		map = &maps[n_maps];
>  		cxl_decode_regblock(reg_lo, reg_hi, map);
>  
> -		/* Ignore unknown register block types */
> -		if (map->reg_type > CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV)
> -			continue;
> +		if (map->reg_type == type)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
>  
> -		ret = cxl_map_regblock(pdev, map);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
>  
> -		ret = cxl_probe_regs(pdev, map);
> -		cxl_unmap_regblock(pdev, map);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +static int cxl_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> +			  struct cxl_register_map *map)
> +{
> +	int rc;
>  
> -		n_maps++;
> -	}
> +	rc = cxl_find_regblock(pdev, type, map);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < n_maps; i++) {
> -		ret = cxl_map_regs(cxlm, &maps[i]);
> -		if (ret)
> -			break;
> -	}
> +	rc = cxl_map_regblock(pdev, map);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	rc = cxl_probe_regs(pdev, map);
> +	cxl_unmap_regblock(pdev, map);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return rc;
>  }
>  
>  static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
> +	struct cxl_register_map map;
>  	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
>  	struct cxl_mem *cxlm;
>  	int rc;
> @@ -518,7 +515,11 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	if (IS_ERR(cxlm))
>  		return PTR_ERR(cxlm);
>  
> -	rc = cxl_pci_setup_regs(cxlm);
> +	rc = cxl_setup_regs(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV, &map);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	rc = cxl_map_regs(cxlm, &map);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists