linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] cxl/pci: Add @base to cxl_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:55:57 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] cxl/pci: Add @base to cxl_register_map

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 9:27 AM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 09:44:29 -0700
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > In addition to carrying @barno, @block_offset, and @reg_type, add @base
> > to keep all map/unmap parameters in one object. The helpers
> > cxl_{map,unmap}_regblock() handle adjusting @base to the @block_offset
> > at map and unmap time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> I don't really mind them, but why the renames
> from cxl_pci_* to cxl_* ?

Primarily because we had a mix of some functions including the _pci
and some not, and I steered towards just dropping it. I think the
"PCI" aspect of the function is clear by its function signature, and
that was being muddied by passing @cxlm unnecessarily. So instead of:

cxl_pci_$foo(struct cxl_mem *cxlm...)

...I went with:

cxl_$foo(struct pci_dev *pdev...)

...concerns?