[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1684834b-f68f-79eb-c12b-f7dbb2420173@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:08:58 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/15] clk: use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() in
clk_rate_get()
On 11/10/2021 at 13:27, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> In case clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE the clk_rate_get()
> will return the cached rate. Thus, use clk_core_get_rate_recalc() which
> takes proper action when clock flags contains CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 65508eb89ec9..64838754cdef 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -3108,7 +3108,7 @@ static int clk_rate_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> {
> struct clk_core *core = data;
>
> - *val = core->rate;
> + *val = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(core);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists