[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63cb6259-ea8e-46a8-63fc-d942c2225fcc@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:46:01 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/container_of.h: switch to static_assert
On 15/10/2021 15.13, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Btw, shouldn't we also remove build_bug.h in the container_of.h with this?
> (Or if this goes first, do we still need bug.h?)
>
We absolutely need build_bug.h, as that is where static_assert is defined.
container_of.h doesn't include bug.h AFAICT, nor should it need to.
(We should still find a quiet place for __same_type and have
container_of include that header, but that's unrelated to this patch.)
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists