[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRYuo+U1wWaz1jiQTk07-6etNMg-2UBDTYmnrLKzVqH8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:16:45 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] dt-bindings: update riscv plic compatible string
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:17 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Okt 16 2021, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
>
> > + The C9xx PLIC does not comply with the interrupt claim/completion process defined
> > + by the RISC-V PLIC specification because C9xx PLIC will mask an IRQ when it is
> > + claimed by PLIC driver (i.e. readl(claim) and the IRQ will be unmasked upon
> > + completion by PLIC driver (i.e. writel(claim). This behaviour breaks the handling
>
> Missing close paren in both parenthetical remarks above.
Opps, thx. I'll fix it.
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
> "And now for something completely different."
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists