lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 16 Oct 2021 09:07:22 +0200
From:   Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     guoren@...nel.org
Cc:     anup@...infault.org, atish.patra@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, palmer@...belt.com, heiko@...ech.de,
        robh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] dt-bindings: update riscv plic compatible string

On Okt 16 2021, guoren@...nel.org wrote:

> +  The C9xx PLIC does not comply with the interrupt claim/completion process defined
> +  by the RISC-V PLIC specification because C9xx PLIC will mask an IRQ when it is
> +  claimed by PLIC driver (i.e. readl(claim) and the IRQ will be unmasked upon
> +  completion by PLIC driver (i.e. writel(claim). This behaviour breaks the handling

Missing close paren in both parenthetical remarks above.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ