lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 16 Oct 2021 10:12:01 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <>
To:     "Fabio M. De Francesco" <>
Cc:     Larry Finger <>,
        Phillip Potter <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,,
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] staging: r8188eu: Use completions instead of

On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 08:43:32AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> 2) The second semaphore came to my attention while working on the first and 
> trying to understand what rtw_cmd_thread() is meant for. It is there for very 
> different reasons. There is only one relation between them, that is that they 
> are used into the same function. Nothing else.
> So I prefer to write a second commit message (in patch 2/3) that explains 
> what the semaphore does and why it is better to replace it with a condition 
> variable. Obviously, this "why are you changing it?" has a different answer 
> with respect of what I say in patch 1/3.

I don't think you're correct, but I will wait for you patch and look

dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists