[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eef611f-77e1-aec5-3e1f-24a14ad50c91@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:28:39 -0700
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] x86/topology: Disable CPU online/offline control
for TDX guest
On 10/17/21 12:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Seriously? This lets the unplug start, which starts to kick off tasks
> from the CPU just to make it fail a few steps later?
>
> The obvious place to prevent this is the CPU hotplug code itself, right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 192e43a87407..c544eb6c79d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -1178,6 +1178,8 @@ static int __ref _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen,
>
> static int cpu_down_maps_locked(unsigned int cpu, enum cpuhp_state target)
> {
> + if (cc_platform_has(CC_HOTPLUG_DISABLED))
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> if (cpu_hotplug_disabled)
> return -EBUSY;
> return _cpu_down(cpu, 0, target);
Makes sense. I will use it in next version.
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists