[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211018225313.GA855976@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:53:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: stern@...land.harvard.edu, parri.andrea@...il.com, will@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr,
akiyks@...il.com, dlustig@...dia.com, joel@...lfernandes.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another possible use for LKMM, or a subset (strengthening)
thereof
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 01:56:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On the perhaps unlikely chance that this is new news of interest...
>
> I have finally prototyped the full "So You Want to Rust the Linux
> Kernel?" series (as in marked "under construction").
>
> https://paulmck.livejournal.com/62436.html
And this blog series is now proclaimed to be feature complete.
Recommendations (both short- and long-term) may be found in the last post,
"TL;DR: Memory-Model Recommendations for Rusting the Linux Kernel",
at https://paulmck.livejournal.com/65341.html.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists