lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Oct 2021 13:29:11 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <>,
        Lai Jiangshan <>,
        Miguel Ojeda <>,
        linux-kernel <>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <>,
        Borislav Petkov <>,
        Kees Cook <>,
        Nathan Chancellor <>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <>,
        Sami Tolvanen <>,
        Masahiro Yamada <>,
        Marco Elver <>, Arnd Bergmann <>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/49] compiler_types.h: Add __noinstr_section() for noinstr

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:16 AM Lai Jiangshan <> wrote:
> I will use __section(section) in the updated patch.
> I don't know whether it is worth for a new version for a relatively large patchset
> with almost 50 patches since the feedback becomes less or I should wait for more
> reviews from the x86 maintainers.  Especially the second half of the patchset which
> is all about IST exceptions has no feedback since V2.

Yeah, what I meant by independent patch is that you may avoid worrying
about that fix within the series, and send it as a completely
different patch (we can also do it for you, if you prefer). It is,
after all, not really related to either this commit nor the series.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists