linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <841ACA86-CE97-4707-BF6E-AC932F1E056D@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:43:49 +0000
From:   "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling

On Oct 17, 2021, at 10:03, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> The latter builds, boots and runs KVM guests, but that reallocation
> functionality is obviously completely untested. 

Compiled and booted on bare-metal and KVM (guest with the same kernel).
No dmesg regression. No selftest regression.

Tested-by Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>

Thanks,
Chang