lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:19:48 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling

On 19/10/21 21:43, Bae, Chang Seok wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2021, at 10:03, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> The latter builds, boots and runs KVM guests, but that reallocation
>> functionality is obviously completely untested.
> 
> Compiled and booted on bare-metal and KVM (guest with the same kernel).
> No dmesg regression. No selftest regression.
> 
> Tested-by Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>

Same here.  Thanks, Chang Seok!

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists