[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPwXO5YguJtSFSqnA_aGPch2NswmrP1EzOs0QH5O_iOdtn5W1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:24:44 +0200
From: Petr Benes <petrben@...il.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Beneš <petr.benes@...ft.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: imx: Fix temperature measurements on i.MX6 after alarm
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 13:38, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/10/2021 13:28, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > I hope you have seen this patch:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210924115032.29684-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de/
> >
> > Are there any reason why this was ignored?
>
> No reasons, I was waiting for some tags before merging it. But I forget
> about it when reviewing the current patch.
Tested Oleksij's patch. It works OK. A question arose. Does it require
CONFIG_PM=y?
If this condition is mandatory and the requirement is valid, Kconfig
should be changed accordingly.
I'm not able to verify it works without PM, seems it doesn't.
>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists