linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mux: fix kernel doc prototype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211020212741.4855df03@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:27:41 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>, kernel@...s.com,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mux: fix kernel doc prototype

On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:17:07 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:

> On 2021-10-19 08:45, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > Fix this warning from scripts/kernel-doc:
> > 
> >  drivers/mux/core.c:391: warning: expecting prototype for
> >  mux_control_try_select(). Prototype was for
> >  mux_control_try_select_delay() instead
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>  
> 
> Obviously. Or, just squash it if that's still an option?
Folded into original commit.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> In case it's easier to just pile it on top:
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter