linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mux: fix kernel doc prototype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72e43201-e419-8fec-09f6-e3a169c086c3@axentia.se>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:49:03 +0200
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>, kernel@...s.com,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mux: fix kernel doc prototype

On 2021-10-20 22:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:17:07 +0200
> Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se> wrote:
> 
>> On 2021-10-19 08:45, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
>>> Fix this warning from scripts/kernel-doc:
>>>
>>>  drivers/mux/core.c:391: warning: expecting prototype for
>>>  mux_control_try_select(). Prototype was for
>>>  mux_control_try_select_delay() instead
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>  
>>
>> Obviously. Or, just squash it if that's still an option?
> Folded into original commit.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan

And I would like to say thanks for a nice series from Vincent and
to you Jonathan for taking care of the mechanics. Much appreciated!

Cheers,
Peter