linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Remove true and false comparison

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 13:03:34 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@...il.com>
Cc:     fabioaiuto83@...il.com, marcocesati@...il.com,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, ross.schm.dev@...il.com,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, mike.rapoport@...il.com,
        staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: rtl8723bs: core: Remove true and false
 comparison

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:24:01PM +0530, Kushal Kothari wrote:
> Remove comparison to true and false in if statement.
> Issue found with checkpatch.pl.
> CHECK: Using comparison to true is error prone
> CHECK: Using comparison to false is error prone
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kushal Kothari <kushalkothari285@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2: Remove unnecessary parentheses.
> 
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 50 ++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> index efc9b1974e38..3e0b910114da 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c
> @@ -309,8 +309,8 @@ int rtw_cmd_filter(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv, struct cmd_obj *cmd_obj)
>  	if (cmd_obj->cmdcode == GEN_CMD_CODE(_SetChannelPlan))
>  		bAllow = true;
>  
> -	if ((pcmdpriv->padapter->hw_init_completed == false && bAllow == false)
> -		|| atomic_read(&(pcmdpriv->cmdthd_running)) == false	/* com_thread not running */
> +	if ((!pcmdpriv->padapter->hw_init_completed && !bAllow) ||
> +		!atomic_read(&pcmdpriv->cmdthd_running) 	/* com_thread not running */
>  	)
>  		return _FAIL;
>  
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ void rtw_free_cmd_obj(struct cmd_obj *pcmd)
>  void rtw_stop_cmd_thread(struct adapter *adapter)
>  {
>  	if (adapter->cmdThread &&
> -		atomic_read(&(adapter->cmdpriv.cmdthd_running)) == true &&
> +		atomic_read(&adapter->cmdpriv.cmdthd_running) &&
>  		adapter->cmdpriv.stop_req == 0) {
>  		adapter->cmdpriv.stop_req = 1;
>  		complete(&adapter->cmdpriv.cmd_queue_comp);
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ int rtw_cmd_thread(void *context)
>  	u8 (*cmd_hdl)(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pbuf);
>  	void (*pcmd_callback)(struct adapter *dev, struct cmd_obj *pcmd);
>  	struct adapter *padapter = context;
> -	struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv = &(padapter->cmdpriv);
> +	struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv = &padapter->cmdpriv;

This is not described in your changelog text and has nothing to do with
booleans :(