linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: Add lan966x ethernet serdes PHY driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXGoGtbFeKa+TVk2@matsya>
Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 23:19:14 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, kishon@...com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] phy: Add lan966x ethernet serdes PHY driver

On 21-10-21, 11:10, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 10/21/2021 11:40, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > 
> > On 20-10-21, 17:49, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 20/10/2021 21:05:49+0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any reason why this is dual licensed, why not GPL only?
> > > > >
> > > > > No reason, I think I copy this from a different file.
> > > >
> > > > Please have a chat with your lawyers on the correct license this should
> > > > have!
> > > Dual GPL and MIT was Microsemi's policy, I'm not sure it carried over to
> > > Microchip.
> > 
> > That is why they need to talk to someone and decide what license
> > applies :)
> 
> I have changed it to be the same as the one on sparx5 because also
> sparx5 is a Microchip product. On sparx5 we used:
> 'SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later'

Has the code been copied/derived from somewhere/auto generated from
scripts/tools or entirely written by you?

-- 
~Vinod