linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] iommu/dma: Use kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Oct 2021 18:50:33 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] iommu/dma: Use kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc()

On 2021-09-28 23:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc().

If we have a thing for that now, then sure, why not. FWIW this can't 
ever overflow due to where "count" comes from, but it has no reason to 
be special.

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>

> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 896bea04c347..18c6edbe5fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc_pages(struct device *dev,
>   	if (!order_mask)
>   		return NULL;
>   
> -	pages = kvzalloc(count * sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	pages = kvcalloc(count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!pages)
>   		return NULL;
>   
>