| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:19:47 +0000
From: "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
To: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Sharma, Deepak" <Deepak.Sharma@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>,
"Fontenot, Nathan" <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>,
"Su, Jinzhou (Joe)" <Jinzhou.Su@....com>,
"Du, Xiaojian" <Xiaojian.Du@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 08/21] cpufreq: amd: add trace for amd-pstate module
[AMD Official Use Only]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 4:13 PM
> To: Huang, Ray <Ray.Huang@....com>; Rafael J . Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>;
> Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>;
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>;
> linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Sharma, Deepak <Deepak.Sharma@....com>; Deucher, Alexander
> <Alexander.Deucher@....com>; Limonciello, Mario
> <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Fontenot, Nathan
> <Nathan.Fontenot@....com>; Su, Jinzhou (Joe) <Jinzhou.Su@....com>;
> Du, Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> x86@...nel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/21] cpufreq: amd: add trace for amd-pstate
> module
>
> On Sun, 2021-09-26 at 17:05 +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > Add trace event to monitor the performance value changes which is
> > controlled by cpu governors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 6 +-
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.c | 2 +
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.h | 96
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 11 ++++
> > 4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644
> > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile index
> > 5c9a2a1ee8dc..04882bc4b145 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ATTR_SET) +=
> cpufreq_governor_attr_set.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT) += cpufreq-dt.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT_PLATDEV) += cpufreq-dt-platdev.o
> >
> > +# Traces
> > +CFLAGS_amd-pstate-trace.o := -I$(src)
> > +amd_pstate-y := amd-pstate.o amd-pstate-
> trace.o
> > +
> >
> >
> ##############################################################
> ########
> > ############
> > # x86 drivers.
> > # Link order matters. K8 is preferred to ACPI because of firmware bugs in
> early
> > @@ -25,7 +29,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT_PLATDEV) += cpufreq-
> dt-platdev.o
> > # speedstep-* is preferred over p4-clockmod.
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ) += acpi-cpufreq.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_AMD_PSTATE) += amd-pstate.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_AMD_PSTATE) += amd_pstate.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K8) += powernow-k8.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_PCC_CPUFREQ) += pcc-cpufreq.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6) += powernow-k6.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..891b696dcd69
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > +#include "amd-pstate-trace.h"
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.h
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..50c85e150f30
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-trace.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * amd-pstate-trace.h - AMD Processor P-state Frequency Driver Tracer
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> > + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> > + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + *
> > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > +along with
> > + * this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-
> 1301, USA.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com> */
> > +
> > +#if !defined(_AMD_PSTATE_TRACE_H) ||
> defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> > +#define _AMD_PSTATE_TRACE_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> > +#include <linux/trace_events.h>
> > +
> > +#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
> > +#define TRACE_SYSTEM amd_cpu
>
> Hello Ray,
>
> I'd prefer if TRACE_SYSTEM was set to "power". In that way the tracepoint is
> easier to find, since it'd be together with other power-related tracepoints. I
> often do
>
> perf list | grep "power:"
>
> to find all that's available, or equivalently
>
> ls $TRACEFS/events/power/
>
> and if your tracepoint is somewhere else, I wouldn't find it.
>
(I just found this mail in my "Junk Email" folder... sorry to miss the mail)
The reason that I create an other file to store the tracer is that I would like to make amd-pstate as a module.
So far, the module is better for debugging at early phase. If we adds it into power system, the amd-pstate has to build in kernel.
> > +
> > +#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE
> > +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE amd-pstate-trace
> > +
> > +#define TPS(x) tracepoint_string(x)
> > +
> > +TRACE_EVENT(amd_pstate_perf,
> > +
> > + TP_PROTO(unsigned long min_perf,
> > + unsigned long target_perf,
> > + unsigned long capacity,
> > + unsigned int cpu_id,
> > + u64 prev,
> > + u64 value,
> > + int type
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_ARGS(min_perf,
> > + target_perf,
> > + capacity,
> > + cpu_id,
> > + prev,
> > + value,
> > + type
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(unsigned long, min_perf)
> > + __field(unsigned long, target_perf)
> > + __field(unsigned long, capacity)
> > + __field(unsigned int, cpu_id)
> > + __field(u64, prev)
> > + __field(u64, value)
> > + __field(int, type)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + __entry->min_perf = min_perf;
> > + __entry->target_perf = target_perf;
> > + __entry->capacity = capacity;
> > + __entry->cpu_id = cpu_id;
> > + __entry->prev = prev;
> > + __entry->value = value;
> > + __entry->type = type;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("amd_min_perf=%lu amd_des_perf=%lu
> amd_max_perf=%lu cpu_id=%u prev=0x%llx value=0x%llx type=0x%d",
> > + (unsigned long)__entry->min_perf,
> > + (unsigned long)__entry->target_perf,
> > + (unsigned long)__entry->capacity,
> > + (unsigned int)__entry->cpu_id,
> > + (u64)__entry->prev,
> > + (u64)__entry->value,
> > + (int)__entry->type
> > + )
> > +);
> > +
> > +#endif /* _AMD_PSTATE_TRACE_H */
> > +
> > +/* This part must be outside protection */ #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> > +#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
> > +
> > +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c index c9bee7b1698a..0c9f9c0c8928
> 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> > @@ -45,10 +45,17 @@
> > #include <asm/processor.h>
> > #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> > #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> > +#include "amd-pstate-trace.h"
> >
> > #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_LATENCY 0x20000
> > #define AMD_PSTATE_TRANSITION_DELAY 500
> >
> > +enum switch_type
> > +{
> > + AMD_TARGET = 0,
> > + AMD_ADJUST_PERF
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct cpufreq_driver amd_pstate_driver;
> >
> > struct amd_cpudata {
> > @@ -183,6 +190,7 @@ amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata,
> u32
> > min_perf, {
> > u64 prev = READ_ONCE(cpudata->cppc_req_cached);
> > u64 value = prev;
> > + enum switch_type type = fast_switch ? AMD_ADJUST_PERF :
> AMD_TARGET;
> >
> > value &= ~REQ_MIN_PERF(~0L);
> > value |= REQ_MIN_PERF(min_perf);
> > @@ -193,6 +201,9 @@ amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata,
> u32 min_perf,
> > value &= ~REQ_MAX_PERF(~0L);
> > value |= REQ_MAX_PERF(max_perf);
> >
> > + trace_amd_pstate_perf(min_perf, des_perf, max_perf,
> > + cpudata->cpu, prev, value, type);
>
> Two things here:
>
> 1. the field "value" seems redundant, as you're already showing me
> {min,des,max}_perf.
> Maybe you can remove "value" from the output of the trace?
> One reason I can think why you're showing me "value", is to let me see if
> it's the
> same as "prev", in which case I'd know the request isn't passed to the
> hardware.
> Is that so? If that's the reason, maybe it would be clear to remove "value",
> "prev"
> and just show a field like "changed={true,false}".
>
Yes, I would like monitor the status and changes that {min,des,max}_perf.
Agree, I will refine and clean up the prints in V3.
> 2. the field "type" is a little obscure for someone reading the trace. It can be
> 0 or 1, and to know what that means one has to read the code. I would
> suggest
> replacing it with a field "fast_switch={true,false}", which is more telling.
> What do you think?
>
No problem, will update it in V3.
Thanks,
Ray
Powered by blists - more mailing lists