[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211021143726.GA213960@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 22:37:26 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv1 1/4] arm64: Use static key for tracing PID in CONTEXTIDR
Hi James,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:33:01PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __init contextidr_init(void)
> > +{
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR))
> > + static_branch_inc(&contextidr_in_use);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +early_initcall(contextidr_init);
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> Can you skip this early_initcall() part if you do something like this:
>
> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR, contextidr_in_use)
>
> It seems like there is a way to conditionally initialise it to true.
Thanks for good point! Will test this way in next spin.
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists