[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8f6dffb-ec7b-c105-51f1-7b761e331a89@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 11:20:45 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mfd: tps80031: Remove driver
22.10.2021 11:05, Lee Jones пишет:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> Driver was upstreamed in 2013 and never got a user, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 14 -
>> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 1 -
>> drivers/mfd/tps80031.c | 526 -----------------------------
>> include/linux/mfd/tps80031.h | 637 -----------------------------------
>> 4 files changed, 1178 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps80031.c
>> delete mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/tps80031.h
>
>> -static const struct i2c_device_id tps80031_id_table[] = {
>> - { "tps80031", TPS80031 },
>> - { "tps80032", TPS80032 },
>> - { }
>> -};
>
> This is an I2C driver, right?
>
> I was under the impression that Linux could do auto-probing on I2C
> devices? Such that they do not require platform code or DT in order
> to bind?
>
It's I2C driver. I'm not sure about auto-probing because something
should provide information about device to Linux. It's possible to
detect/scan whether there is device sitting on I2C address, but there is
no auto-discovery mechanism, AFAIK.
TPS80031 device will fail to bind to this driver because it explicitly
requires platform data which should be NULL if device is probed solely
by I2C ID.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists