[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXLLRLwMG7nEwQoi@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:31:32 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of subdevice voltage
regulators
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:06:57AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> +static const char * const supplies[] = {
> + "vpcie3v3-supply",
> + "vpcie3v3aux-supply",
> + "brcm-ep-a-supply",
> + "brcm-ep-b-supply",
> +};
Why are you including "-supply" in the names here? That will lead to
a double -supply when we look in the DT which probably isn't what you're
looking for.
Also are you *sure* that the device has supplies with names like
"brcm-ep-a"? That seems rather unidiomatic for electrical engineering,
the names here are supposed to correspond to the names used in the
datasheet for the part.
> + /* This is for Broadcom STB/CM chips only */
> + if (pcie->type == BCM2711)
> + return 0;
It is a relief that other chips have managed to work out how to avoid
requiring power.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists