linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: clean up the Kconfig file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Oct 2021 16:35:43 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: clean up the Kconfig file

On 10/24/21 2:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/23/21 23:43, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> @@ -39,7 +38,7 @@ config SCSI_UFSHCD
>>       select DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
>>       select NLS
>>       help
>> -      This selects the support for UFS devices in Linux, say Y and make
>> +      This selects the support for UFS devices in Linux. Say Y and make
> 
> How about changing "This selects the support for UFS devices in Linux"
> into "Enables support for UFS devices"? "the" should be left out from a
> grammatical point of view and "in Linux" is redundant.

OK, done (locally).

>>         sure that you know the name of your UFS host adapter (the card
>>         inside your computer that "speaks" the UFS protocol, also
>>         called UFS Host Controller), because you will be asked for it.
>> @@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ config SCSI_UFSHCD
>>         (the one containing the directory /) is located on a UFS device.
>>   config SCSI_UFSHCD_PCI
>> -    tristate "PCI bus based UFS Controller support"
>> +    tristate "PCI bus-based UFS Controller support"
> 
> Even with this change applied capitalization is inconsistent.

I don't doubt it, but could you be more explicit about
which word(s) you mean, please?

I see one "pci" in the Kconfig file.
I see several "Controller" vs. "controller."
I see a few of "Support" vs. "support."

Which are you referring to? (or something else)

thanks.
-- 
~Randy